We remain fully operational and committed to serving your needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. CLICK HERE for information about our response to this public health emergency.

Call Today 805.204.4599
Our Legal Blog View Our Latest Posts

Certified appeal specialist Gabriele Lashly prevailed on appeal in homeowner association dispute.

After protracted trial, attorneys Barry Reagan and Michael Lebow, obtained a judgment in favor of their clients, the homeowners association and its board members. The plaintiffs appealed.

In a published decision, Eith v. Ketelhut, the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment of the Ventura Superior Court that the Ketelhuts operat=ion of a vineyard on their property did not violate the CCR&Rs. The CCR&Rs prohibited all business and commercial use of the property. The Ketelhuts had planted the backyard of their residedence with grapes which were used to make wine and sell wine offsite. The Court of Appeal found that the vineyard did not constitute commercial or business use of the property as a matter of law as the winemaking and selling of the bottled wine did not occur on the property and the planting of the property with grapes did not disturb the residential character of the community. The board of homeowners association acted within ist discretion in allowing the continued operation of the vineyard and its decision is entitled to judicial deference.